Furthermore, it argues that this applies to the manifestations of the own political formations, the more whether assert it of a grouping of people who meet with the purpose of sharing or presentation of ideas, interests dnsa or advertising problems and demands, and not with the intention of attracting votes. The ruling recognizes that not doubt is no that the views arising from such exchange, dnsa or vindication of ideas can become influencing the citizen, but it points out that this situation can only be regarded as a mere suspicion or a mere possibility. You may find Ultra Wellness Center to be a useful source of information. From there, concludes that only when you provide reasons founded on the nature electoral manifestation, when its purpose is acquisition of votes and this has not been convened by parties, federations, coalitions or groupings, only legal persons that can be campaigning alongside its candidates, may disallow is the same based on this reason. Excluded, therefore, that a demonstration can ban by its potential impact on the electoral process. In particular, TC considered that Barcelona Provincial Electoral Board raised doubts about the impact of the manifestation of the mossos to reject it by having incidence, an expression that was just used by the Madrid Electoral Board to reject concentration convened at the Puerta del Sol (Madrid). And in the day of reflection? Identical conditions are those required by the Constitutional Court so that it can develop a demonstration coinciding with the day of reflection prior to an election call, doctrine that was highlighted with the amparo requested by the March 8 platform of Sevilla, who were prevented from leaving the street day working women of 2008it coincided with the day of reflection of the last general election. In the judgement of the constitutional, dated 15 November 2010, the High Court recalls that on the day of reflection you may not disseminate electoral propaganda or carried out acts of electoral campaign, but adds that this does not mean that that day no manifestation whose purpose has anything to do with the political debate can be held, and therefore can indirectly influence the decisions of voters. For the High Court is elemental to all meeting It can be connected ultimately with the political debate and the decisions of the voters, but it says that dndiendo this argument as the cause of prohibition will reach the absurdity of preventing any meeting or demonstration in a day of reflection. The mere possibility that a claim might affect the electorate shown as hypothesis insufficient to limit the right of meeting in an electoral period, insists the TC. Source of the news:: TC estimates that demonstrations may prohibit only if its purpose is to capture votes
You are currently browsing the archives for 16 June 2016.
Displaying 1 entry.